![]() ![]() Low: vulnerabilities with a CVSS base score of 0.0–3.9Įntries may include additional information provided by organizations and efforts sponsored by CISA.Medium: vulnerabilities with a CVSS base score of 4.0–6.9.High: vulnerabilities with a CVSS base score of 7.0–10.0.The division of high, medium, and low severities correspond to the following scores: Vulnerabilities are based on the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) vulnerability naming standard and are organized according to severity, determined by the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) standard. Please visit NVD for updated vulnerability entries, which include CVSS scores once they are available. In some cases, the vulnerabilities in the bulletin may not yet have assigned CVSS scores. ![]() More research examining how various cognitive and movement tasks interact to alter functional movement among pathological populations is warranted before clinical implementation.The CISA Vulnerability Bulletin provides a summary of new vulnerabilities that have been recorded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Vulnerability Database (NVD) in the past week. Conclusions: Slight, but potentially important, kinematic and kinetic differences were observed between single- and dual-task that may have implications for functional movement assessments and injury risk research. ![]() No other outcomes were different between single and dual task ( P ≥ .053). Less hip-flexion torque occurred during dual task than single task (mean difference = −0.09 N/BW 95% CI, −0.17 to −0.02). Results: Dual-task resulted in greater peak vertical ground reaction force compared with single-task during jump landing (mean difference = 0.06 N/BW 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.12 P = .025) but less force during dominant leg cutting (mean difference = −0.08 N/BW 95% CI, −0.14 to −0.02 P = .015).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |